6 Comments

What rich post! So many important ideas distilled. Here are the three I'm taking with me:

1. You’re only going to catch the students that actually need help.

2. Ask students to submit chat logs (seems especially important given what we saw this week from Apple).

3. Transparency for students and teachers is the key to "help us continue to figure out our usage approaches and what feels appropriate and inappropriate."

Expand full comment
author

thanks Rob! I think that succinctly captures it...and the transparency has been a big issue for me for a while....I think it's really easy to miss this and that creates gaps in trust and understanding

Expand full comment

I agree. This is great. I also love the framing of #1.

Expand full comment
author

thanks Jason! I've been saying this about regular plagiarism checkers for years...doubly true for AI plagiarism detectors!

Expand full comment

I especially like the prompt for reflection, and the suggestion that it could be done by audio/talking on one's phone.

The stoplight model for communicating when AI use is encouraged or not is excellent.

I also use a vertical mouse like this!

Expand full comment
author

yeah--I think the value-added of interviewing and audio can help a lot of folks (I know I'm using it more!). And yes, I've been using this mouse for 8 or so years...and a faculty member saw it and was like "oooh"...so I had to include it!

Expand full comment